Mitigating disinformation, bad press and image compromise.
Agentic tools and traditional PR, guided by Hollywood-informed and intelligence-informed narrative direction. We set the story the record should hold, then run the work — agentic monitoring and suppression, and traditional media and PR — under that direction.
Seven lines of work, under one direction. Narrative strategy comes first: the claim we will hold, and the story the record is missing. Then we execute — with agentic tools that watch, flag and work the record, and with traditional media and PR that carry the account. The tools do not set the strategy. The direction does.
Narrative direction decides which queries matter and which results are actually load-bearing. Agentic monitoring keeps the first page in view; traditional content and media are how we compete for it. Lawful, structured, consistent work is how a distorted result loses altitude. We do not use deceptive link schemes, fake properties or manufactured consensus.
Platform policy, not invention — and always in service of the narrative we have agreed to hold. We help you respond, request removal of reviews that violate stated rules, and invite authentic feedback from real customers and counterparties. We will not write fake reviews, pay for undisclosed endorsements, or staff sockpuppet accounts.
This is the center of the work, not a content calendar. Narrative direction — Hollywood-informed story craft, informed by an intelligence picture of what is already circulating — decides the claim, the sequence and the assets. We then build the messaging house and the owned record that carries it, including the answers AI systems assemble from public sources. Removal alone leaves an empty space. Direction is what fills it.
Direction first, even when the clock is short: what we say, what we do not say, and in what order. Agentic monitoring tells us what is moving; traditional PR and media are how we answer. Holding statements, spokesperson prep, and a sequenced public record while the story is still forming. Hour one beats week three. Best bought as a retainer, because the capability only pays when it is already running when the claim appears.
Takedowns serve the narrative; they are not the narrative. Where material is defamatory, fabricated, non-consensual, copyrighted without license, or in breach of platform policy, we assemble the evidence package and pursue removal, correction or de-indexing through platform, host, registrar and counsel. Defamation and DMCA claims are handled through counsel. Accurate reporting and lawful public records are not “taken down” by force of will.
Often a precondition for a cleaner narrative, not a substitute for one. Exposure assessment for principals and their households, then systematic opt-outs and takedowns across data brokers and people-search sites, with a maintenance program so listings that reappear get worked again. High-touch work, not a consumer unsubscribe tool. Identity documents, when a broker requires them, move through a secure intake — never through a marketing form.
Agentic monitoring is how we hold the direction in the field: a standing read across search, social, forums, syndicated news, review platforms and the fringe outlets where most problems start — tuned to your name, your people and the claims most likely to be used against you. You hear it from us, not from a reporter asking for comment. The same watch includes periodic re-queries of major AI systems, because those answers drift as models retrain.
No engagement starts with a press release, and none starts by pointing tools at the internet and hoping. It starts with narrative strategy: read the record, then decide the story we will hold. Execution follows — agentic monitoring and suppression, and traditional media and PR — always under that direction.
Collect the record — search, news, reviews, social, public record, people-search, current AI answers — then write the strategy. The claim we will hold, the audiences that matter, what can be reduced, and what we will not say. You get the direction before anyone runs a tool or drafts a placement.
Stand up agentic monitoring across the places a claim actually starts, tuned to the narrative we have decided to hold. You hear movement from us, not from a reporter asking for comment.
Agentic and lawful suppression: broker opt-outs, policy-based takedowns, de-indexing and review challenges — each with an evidence package, each in service of the direction. Worked again when copies reappear.
Traditional media, PR, owned content and placement, sequenced so each piece makes the next one easier to land. Nothing ships that we cannot source, and nothing ships off-message.
The direction stays in force. Agentic watch plus human correction and a standing crisis posture — because the story does not end when the first wave of removals does, and empty spaces get refilled.
Quiet, methodical exposure reduction and reputation remediation when a name has become a search result you no longer recognize.
Executive privacy, search and review work, and the media readiness to handle attention when it arrives — or to recover after it already has.
When coverage, reviews or a coordinated claim has outrun the facts. Narrative direction first, then agentic and traditional execution — nothing on instinct.
Evidence-grade packaging for takedowns and de-indexing, and disciplined communications around active matters, coordinated with counsel.
A long-run record — owned assets, monitoring and correction — for people and organizations that live in the public eye.
People-search and broker listings often publish family members beside the principal. We work those exposures with authorization, and we do not open a separate file on a relative without it.
We do not publish a client list. Most of the people who hire us do so precisely because they would rather not be discussed — and that discretion does not expire when the engagement does. No case-study wall, no logo parade, no name-dropping on a sales call. References are made available privately, with the client’s permission, when the conversation warrants it.
We do not start by running tools and seeing what happens. We start by deciding the story the public record should hold — informed by Hollywood-informed story craft and by an intelligence picture of what is already circulating, including collection through Meridia Ops. Agentic systems then watch and work the record; traditional PR and media carry the account. We are a communications firm. We do not claim government affiliation.
No, and we will not tell you otherwise. Material that is accurate, lawfully published, or part of the public record often cannot be removed. What we can do is inventory what is actually load-bearing, pursue removal or de-indexing where a policy or a legal basis exists, and build a stronger, sourced account so the record a stranger meets is no longer only the worst thing that ranks.
Those products are built for volume. This is built for principals, households and organizations whose exposure carries professional or personal risk. We assess the actual record, work brokers and people-search sites with follow-through, and pair the privacy work with search, narrative and monitoring — then we stay on the listings that reappear.
No. We do not write fake reviews, buy undisclosed endorsements, operate sockpuppet accounts, or stand up deceptive properties to manipulate search. Review work stays inside platform rules. Content we publish is real, sourced and attributable.
Where there is a legal basis — defamation, copyright infringement, non-consensual intimate imagery, or a clear platform-policy violation — we assemble the evidence package and pursue removal or de-indexing through the platform, the host, the registrar and counsel. Defamation and DMCA claims are handled through counsel. We do not freelance legal threats.
Narrative strategy comes first and is measured in weeks, not months. Broker and people-search work often shows a first wave of results in a few weeks, then requires maintenance. Search and narrative shifts are slower; they are usually planned in quarters, not days. Crisis work runs on hours and days. Timelines depend on what the record actually shows, and we will tell you what is realistic before we start.
Not unless you ask us to say so. Engagements are confidential by default. We do not publish case studies or client logos, and we do not use your name as a testimonial without your written permission.
Send a confidential note describing the situation — not government identification, not financial credentials, not medical records. If the work requires those, we will open a secure intake. We operate under NDA by default.